Bjorn Lomborg, he says, charts a middle way between a climate change debate that has devolved into shouting between two extremes – one proclaiming imminent apocalypse, the other painting sugar-plum fantasies of a greening earth.
“Lomborg says a better approach would be pouring money into R&D to drive down the costs of solar energy, ocean wave power, 4th generation nukes, and biofuels produced from non-edible feedstocks, so that they can compete with oil and coal. Spend money on the unavoidable need to adapt to climate change already in the pipeline – better sea walls, for example.”
> Read the review here.
